tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074476096730461911.post9051385843052049210..comments2024-03-07T23:17:00.748-08:00Comments on Philologia Tibetica: ལ་སོགས་པ།Dorji Wangchuk (Kuliśeśvara)http://www.blogger.com/profile/02042613761261634658noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074476096730461911.post-21055045521325886582012-01-03T06:21:34.378-08:002012-01-03T06:21:34.378-08:00Dear Achim,
The first suggestion is agreeable. T...Dear Achim, <br /><br />The first suggestion is agreeable. The second, however, is not. In fact it is in the archaic sources (e.g. Dunhuang materials) that abound in las stsogs pa. See, for instance: http://otdo.aa.tufs.ac.jp/search/kwic.cgi<br /><br />D.Dorji Wangchuk (Kuliśeśvara)https://www.blogger.com/profile/02042613761261634658noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074476096730461911.post-26468572334501478422012-01-02T00:11:41.067-08:002012-01-02T00:11:41.067-08:00la sogs pa - "to be grouped together with...&...la sogs pa - "to be grouped together with..." (=of the same category as)? <br /><br />las sogs pa -- evtl. falsche Modernisierung von "la stsogs pa" (la s tsogs pa)? <br /><br />AchimAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com